![multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400](https://www.itshop.bg/userfiles/productimages/product_7210.jpg)
- #Multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 drivers#
- #Multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 software#
- #Multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 plus#
A scan with 24.000 dpi results in an image file of approximately 800 megapixels in case of a data size of approximately 2,5 gigabyte one will hear his computer moaning. In case the scanner would only approximate the nominal resolution of 7200dpi, this would be already a sensationally high value.
#Multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 software#
But this value can be only considered as an advertisement stunt, as the artificial puffing of the image through a software interpolation does not make any sense and can be also accomplished with any image in an image processing programe. In the data sheet of the scanner, the producer declares a maximal resolution of 24.000 dpi that is achieved by the software interpolation.
#Multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 drivers#
As a comparison with a case of the daily life, by purchasig a small car for 15.000 € one does not necessarily need an air conditioning, but most of the car drivers cannot imagine a car without this quasi-standard equipment. An automatic dust and scratch correction is certainly not necessary in case of scanning some slides and negatives, but the quality loss in comparison to a scanner with ICE-function is already considerable. But I consider this to be a big shortcoming, as this is almost a standard of the film scanners of today there are only a few low-cost models that do not have an automatic dust and scatch correction based on the hardware. Apparently, this is considered as one of the "unnecessary high-end-functions" from which the producer abstained in this device, according to his own declaration. It remains to be seen if it makes sense to make such a huge file of a 35-mm format.Īs it was also the case of the previous model, Plustek OpticFilm 7400 does not offer a scratch and dust correction based on the hardware. If the colour depth of 48 Bit is adjusted, the data quantity even doubles to approximately 420 megabytes! In order to process such data, a very fast computer of large memory is needed. A scan with 7200 dpi in uncompressed TIF-format provides a file of approximately 210 MByte. In case of a 35mm-slide or a 35mm-negative, an image file of 70 megapixels is generated in the highest resolution. Thus, by purchasing this scanner you will get a complete package with the device, two film adapters (each one for the framed slides and for the film srips), power supply, USB-cable, a bag that is, according to my opinion, completely useless, as also a software package consisting on the excellent scan software SilverFast SE Plus, the simple QuickScan, ImageFolio and ImageExplorer.įor this film scanner, the producer declares a sensational optical resolution of 7200 dpi.
![multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/41iKM4CsoDL.jpg)
Equipment, accessoires and performance data of the film scannerįrom the exterior, the Plustek OpticFilm 7400 only differs from its previous model Plustek OpticFilm 7300 in the case colour and the missing illuminated viewing window for the slides at the top part of the scanner, and also the equipment corresponds without exception to the one of the OpticFilm 7300. There is anyway no difference in the technical data and the equipment. Thus, this test report will show whether something else than the colour of the case - now the scanner is of a very posh navy colour - changed. But the OpticFilm 7300 already offered these functions.
#Multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 plus#
The newly developed LED and features as MultiExposure and MultiSampling, enabled by the scan software SilverFast SE Plus that is included in the scope of delivery, give hope.
![multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400 multi exposure silverfast 8.8 plustek 7400](https://james-versuche.com/mvrg/m-usPzCKUZG0azqobP7FdQHaE7.jpg)
This scanner was replaced by the successor Plustek OpticFilm 8100 in February 2012.